<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 16-bit vs 8-bit files for fine art printing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://valleau.art/blog/16-bit-vs-8-bit-files-for-fine-art-printing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://valleau.art/blog/16-bit-vs-8-bit-files-for-fine-art-printing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 01:57:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave		</title>
		<link>https://valleau.art/blog/16-bit-vs-8-bit-files-for-fine-art-printing/#comment-224</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 01:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://valleau.art/blog/?p=488#comment-224</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would just add that you can in fact edit an 8-bit image with pretty decent results if you first convert it to 16-bit, then apply the edits, then convert it back (if desired) to 8-bit.  As long as the editing is done in 16-bits, you should be good.   Of course, the ideal would be to have an original 16-bit file to work with...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would just add that you can in fact edit an 8-bit image with pretty decent results if you first convert it to 16-bit, then apply the edits, then convert it back (if desired) to 8-bit.  As long as the editing is done in 16-bits, you should be good.   Of course, the ideal would be to have an original 16-bit file to work with&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
