<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Way Off Topic &#8211; Tracy Valleau</title>
	<atom:link href="https://valleau.art/blog/category/way-off-topic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://valleau.art/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 22:08:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Tic-Tac UAP (aka UFO)</title>
		<link>https://valleau.art/blog/the-tic-tac-uap-aka-ufo/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tvalleau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 21:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Way Off Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://valleau.art/blog/?p=594</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes this is Way Off Topic, but there&#8217;s so much noise about it, I feel I had to add my own additional noise. The &#8220;Tic-Tac&#8221; UAP (Unidentified Arial Phenomena)  is a UFO famously recorded by US Navy airmen, and the subject of a recent full scale investigation by the US Congress. Lots of video, lots [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes this is <em><strong>Way Off Topic</strong></em>, but there&#8217;s so much noise about it, I feel I had to add my own additional noise.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Tic-Tac&#8221; UAP (Unidentified Arial Phenomena)  is a UFO famously recorded by US Navy airmen, and the subject of a recent full scale investigation by the US Congress. Lots of video, lots of hand wringing, lots of speeculation  that it&#8217;s aliens violating the laws of physics.  (Just so you won&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve joined the tinfoil-hat crowd, here&#8217;s the gist of it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_UFO_videos.)</p>
<p>The only way this works for me is if the Tic-Tac itself is a hologram.</p>
<p>As a massless hologram it could easily exhibit all the observed traits. (Amazing speed &amp; impossible direction change are easy with lasers.) Probably generated by black ops satellites (or nearby ships). Some types of radar can interact with holograms, ie HSR.</p>
<p>Probably a government project. Certainly not alien. (Would aliens buzz our military, or is it more likely our own military running a test?)</p>
<p>I suspect this project began decades ago, with satellite lasers being tested in agricultural areas of the UK. (The so-called &#8220;crop circles&#8221;.)</p>
<p>The reason it&#8217;s &#8220;black&#8221; is because they must have figured out how to keep the divergence (width) extremely tight &#8211; tighter than the genral public knows. That is, when we shoot a laser at the moon, by the time it get there, the &#8220;dot of light&#8221; is extremely faint, as it&#8217;s about 120 miles wide. But if the point of origin is measured in feet instead of hundreds of thousands of miles, I&#8217;d imagine you could generate an unfocused blob, or simple geometric shape. </p>
<p>As far as public knowledge goes, there are all kinds of technical and theoretical issues with doing this, but again, that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s &#8220;black.&#8221;</p>
<p>Additionally, notice that we have no evidence that there is any physical interaction going on. One of these &#8220;ojects&#8221; sweeps at thousands of miles an hour just feet above the surface of the ocean, at there is no wake nor disturbance of the water. The ONLY way the speed; the changes of direction; the lack of physical interaction can be photographed is if the object is massless &#8211; made of light.</p>
<p>No magic; no little green men; no violation of the laws of physics &#8211; just a clever black op. It&#8217;s the only explanation that actually makes sense, at least to me.</p>
<p>Just my two cents. </p>
<p>(I have disabled comments on this because of the tin-hat crowd. I&#8217;m not interested in discussing it; merely wanted to get it out there.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
