{"id":63,"date":"2021-05-08T19:15:00","date_gmt":"2021-05-08T19:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.valleau.art\/blog\/?p=63"},"modified":"2021-05-08T19:15:00","modified_gmt":"2021-05-08T19:15:00","slug":"1440-vs-2880-youre-looking-at-it-wrong-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/valleau.art\/blog\/1440-vs-2880-youre-looking-at-it-wrong-2011\/","title":{"rendered":"1440 vs 2880 &#8211; you&#8217;re looking at it wrong. (2011)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Most folks I know who print their own images on Epson printers say &#8220;skip the 2880 since it uses twice the ink, and there&#8217;s no difference in the detail.&#8221; In fact, you&#8217;ll find this repeated constantly by most online pundits and magazine article authors.<\/p>\n<p>Well&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230; it uses about 10% more ink, not &#8220;twice the ink&#8221;&#8230; but then, what&#8217;s the point if there&#8217;s no more detail?<\/p>\n<p>There are two points, actually. First, you&#8217;ll get better, more rich colors. (Look at flat areas of color, and you&#8217;ll see what I mean.)<\/p>\n<p>But the second point is that if you&#8217;re looking for increased detail, you&#8217;re looking in the wrong place.<\/p>\n<p>While there is some modest increase in detail, I&#8217;d agree that\u00a0\u00a0it&#8217;s pretty much negligible. However, I finally did find the difference, and it&#8217;s at the opposite end of the spectrum from detail: the softness. \u00a0The difference shows up in gradations, and is particularly apparent in shadows.<\/p>\n<p>In the PDI test image (the one with the four children&#8217;s faces at the bottom) \u00a0there are many objects casting shadows on the white wall behind them. The 2880 does a much better job of making those shadows look as if they were cast by actual light, and less like spattered ink. There is a softer, more natural and luminescent look to them in the 2880 print.<\/p>\n<p>So, I&#8217;d not be in such a big hurry to discard printing at 2880, frankly. There are some visible benefits.<\/p>\n<p>But, as always, run your own tests!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Most folks I know who print their own images on Epson printers say &#8220;skip the 2880 since it uses twice the ink, and there&#8217;s no difference in the detail.&#8221; In fact, you&#8217;ll find this repeated constantly by most online pundits and magazine article authors. Well&#8230;. &#8230; it uses about 10% more ink, not &#8220;twice the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-63","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-photo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/valleau.art\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/valleau.art\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/valleau.art\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/valleau.art\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/valleau.art\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/valleau.art\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64,"href":"https:\/\/valleau.art\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63\/revisions\/64"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/valleau.art\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/valleau.art\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/valleau.art\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}